图书介绍

MULTI-SOURCED EQUIVALENT NORMS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW2025|PDF|Epub|mobi|kindle电子书版本百度云盘下载

MULTI-SOURCED EQUIVALENT NORMS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
  • TOMER BROUDE AND YUVAL SHANY 著
  • 出版社: OXFORD AND PORTLAND,OREGON
  • ISBN:1849461457
  • 出版时间:2011
  • 标注页数:333页
  • 文件大小:19MB
  • 文件页数:349页
  • 主题词:

PDF下载


点此进入-本书在线PDF格式电子书下载【推荐-云解压-方便快捷】直接下载PDF格式图书。移动端-PC端通用
种子下载[BT下载速度快]温馨提示:(请使用BT下载软件FDM进行下载)软件下载地址页直链下载[便捷但速度慢]  [在线试读本书]   [在线获取解压码]

下载说明

MULTI-SOURCED EQUIVALENT NORMS IN INTERNATIONAL LAWPDF格式电子书版下载

下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。

建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台)。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用!后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载!

(文件页数 要大于 标注页数,上中下等多册电子书除外)

注意:本站所有压缩包均有解压码: 点击下载压缩包解压工具

图书目录

1 The International Law and Policy of Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany1

Ⅰ The Puzzle of Normative Parallelism in International Law1

Ⅱ The Rise of MSENs in Fragmented International Law3

Ⅲ Defining and Characterizing Equivalence5

Ⅳ Same,Same,but Different?Context and the Differences Embedded in MSENs8

Ⅴ Oil or Sand in the Gear Shift? MSENs as the Transmission System of International Law9

Ⅵ What’s on the Menu? Ways of Regulating Interaction between MSENs13

A The ’Dominant Norm / Regime’(or Lex Specalis) Model13

B The Cumulative Model13

C The Integrative Model14

Ⅶ Conclusions14

PART Ⅰ MSENS AND THE FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW19

2 Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws? Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of International Law Ralf Michaels and Joost Pauwelyn19

Ⅰ Introduction19

Ⅱ Interactions within Legal Systems:Conflict of Norms23

A Solutions in Domestic Law23

B Prerequisites24

Ⅲ Interactions between Legal Systems:Conflict of Laws26

A Solutions in Domestic Law26

B Prerequisites29

Ⅳ Interactions in Public International Law31

A General International Law and Treaties31

B Conflicts within One Branch of International Law33

C Conflicts between Branches of International Law35

D Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms39

Ⅴ Concluding Thoughts:Is International Law a System?42

3 The Power of Secondary Rules to Connect the International and National Legal Orders Andre Nollkaemper45

Ⅰ Introduction50

Ⅱ Situations in which the Application of Secondary Rules of International Law may make a Difference50

Ⅲ Obligations to give effect to Secondary Norms54

A International Obligations to give effect to Secondary Norms54

B National Obligations to give effect to Secondary Norms58

Ⅳ The Essential Connection between Primary and Secondary Norms59

Ⅴ Secondary Rules as a Normative Penumbra61

Ⅵ The Limiting Effect of National Law64

Ⅶ Conclusion67

4 Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms from the Standpoint of Governments&Erik Denters and Tarcisio Gazzini69

Ⅰ Introduction69

Ⅱ Governmental versus Judicial Perspective70

Ⅲ Identical MSENs75

Ⅳ Similar MSENS80

Ⅴ Compliance or Non-Compliance with MSENs84

Ⅵ State Practice and Converging MSENs86

Ⅶ Conclusions88

PART Ⅱ MSENS IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE93

5 Interpreting Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms:Judicial Borrowing in International Courts&Benedikt Pirker93

Ⅰ Introduction93

Ⅱ Judicial Borrowing,Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms and International Courts and Tribunals94

A The Playing Field for Judicial Borrowing and Comparative Law in International and Municipal Law95

B Comparative Law in a Municipal Context97

C Taking it to the Next Level:Judicial Borrowing by International Courts and Tribunals98

Ⅲ The EFTA Court and the L’Oreal Norge Case99

A The Origins and Legal Framework of the EEA99

B The Case Law before L’Oreal Norge:Interpretive Divergence,but Justified?101

C L’Oreal Norge:A Revolutionary’Presumption of Homogeneity?’103

D Evaluation of the Process of Judicial Borrowing in L’Oreal Norge:The Neglected Nature of the EEA104

Ⅳ The MERCOSUR Retreaded Tyres Dispute107

A The Earlier Case Law on Retreaded Tyres107

B Laudo No 1/2005:The PRC and the ECJ’s Case Law on Balancing Trade and Environmental Interests109

C Evaluation of the Process of Judicial Borrowing by the PRC110

Ⅴ Conclusion112

6 Jurisdictions and Applicable Law Clauses:Where does a Tribunal find the Principal Norms Applicable to the Case before it?&Lorand Bartels115

Ⅰ Introduction115

Ⅱ Principal and Incidental Norms117

Ⅲ Principal Norms120

A Default Functions of Applicable Law Clauses120

B Relationship between Jurisdiction and Applicable Law Clauses123

i Claims based on Norms set out only in an Applicable Law Clause124

a ‘Cardinal’Distinction between Jurisdictional and Applicable Law Clauses?124

b Lex Specalis126

c Failure to apply Lex Specalis Principle128

ii Claims based on Norms set out only in a Jurisdiction Clause130

a Article 36 prevails over Article 38(1) in Violation of International Law131

b Principal Norms cannot be Applied in Violation of International Law135

Ⅳ Incidental Norms137

A Validity or Applicability of a Principal Norm137

B Rules of Interpretation140

C Legal Facts140

Ⅴ Conclusion141

7 The OSPAR Convention,the Aarhus Convention and EC Law:Normative and Institutional Fragmentation on the Right of Access to Environmental Information&Nikolaos Lavranos143

Ⅰ Introduction143

Ⅱ The Relevant MSEN144

A The Factual Background145

B Access to Information under the Ospar Convention148

C Access to Information under the Aarhus Convention150

D Access to Information under EC Law153

i EC Directive 90/313 and Directive 2003/4153

ii Regulation 1049/2001 and Regulation 1367/2006156

E Summary158

Ⅲ Analysis158

A The Applicable Law160

B The Definition of the term ‘Information164

Ⅳ Concluding Remarks166

8 EU Review of UN Anti-Terror Sanctions:Judicial Juggling in a Four-Layer, Multi-Sourced, Equivalent-Norms Scenario&Guy Harpaz171

Ⅰ Introduction171

Ⅱ Anti-Terror Sanctions:The Multilateral,Regional and National Contexts174

Ⅲ The MSENs Scenario176

Ⅳ The CFI Verdict and the ECJ Judgment179

Ⅴ EU Law vis-a-vis International Law/ UN Law:The Dominant Regime Model?183

A The ECJ’s Traditional Approach183

B The CFI Verdict185

C The ECJ’s Judgment186

D Analysis187

Ⅵ ELU Law vis-a-vis the ECHR:The Integrative Model?196

A The Traditional Approach196

B The CFI Verdict and the ECJ Judgment197

C Analysis198

Ⅶ EU Law vis-a-vis the Legal Orders of Member States:The Contesting Model?202

Ⅷ Common Unifying Features203

A Internalizing the MSENs Conflicts203

B One‘Offensive’and Two ’Defensive’Solange Instruments204

Ⅸ Summary and Conclusions206

PART Ⅲ MSENS IN SPECIFIC NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS211

9 The Interaction between International Investment Law and Human Rights Treaties: A Sociological Perspective&Moshe Hirsch211

Ⅰ Introduction211

Ⅱ Investment Tribunals and Human Rights Treaties214

Ⅲ Socio-Cultural Distance and MSENs218

Ⅳ The Socio-Cultural Distance between Investment and Human Rights Laws219

Ⅴ Dynamic Aspects and Future Normative Distance227

Ⅵ Concluding Remarks228

10 Delineating Primary and Secondary Rules on Necessity at International Law&Jurgen Kurtz231

Ⅰ Introduction231

Ⅱ The Legal Standards on Necessity in International Law233

A The Plea of‘Necessity’under Customary International Law233

B The Treaty Exception: Article Ⅺ of the US-Argentine Bilateral Investment Treaty237

Ⅲ Understanding the Relationship between the Customary Plea and Treaty Exception:Engaging Text,Context and History240

Ⅳ The Cases247

A Conflation:CMS,Enron and Sempra248

B The Treaty Exception as(Soft or Hard)Lex Specialis? LG?E v Argentina251

C Separating Primary-Secondary Applications:Continental v Argentina252

Ⅴ Conclusion256

11 Equivalent Primary Rules and Differential Secondary Rules: Countermeasures in WTO and Investment Protection Law&Martins Paparinskis259

Ⅰ Introduction259

Ⅱ Countermeasures in WTO and Investment Protection Law263

Ⅲ WTO Countermeasures in Investment Protection Law270

Ⅳ Investment Protection Law Countermeasures in WTO Law280

Ⅴ Conclusion287

12 Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms and the Legitimacy of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights under International Law&Claire Charters289

Ⅰ Introduction289

Ⅱ Legitimacy290

Ⅲ MSENs of Indigenous Peoples’Rights and Legitimacy Deficit291

A Process Legitimacy292

B Substance Uncertainty300

C Incoherence302

Ⅳ Mitigating MSEN Legitimacy Deficits303

A Balancing Process Confusion and Norm Substance Indeterminacy with Justice304

i Increased Institutional Responsiveness304

ii Increased Norm Justice307

B Dialogic Attempts to Minimise Institutional Jurisdictional Competition308

C Dialogic Attempts to Interpret Norms Consistently:Lessening Norm Indeterminacy313

D The Cohesive Force of Indigenous Peoples’Participation in International Legal Forums316

Ⅴ Conclusion319

13 Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms:Concluding Thoughts&Robert Howse321

Index327

热门推荐