图书介绍

THE SEPRATION OF POWERS AND LEGISATIVE INTERFERENCE IN JUDICIAL PROCESS2025|PDF|Epub|mobi|kindle电子书版本百度云盘下载

PETER A GERANGELOS 著
出版社： OREGON
ISBN：1841136611
出版时间：2009
标注页数：338页
文件大小：17MB
文件页数：357页
主题词：

PDF下载

点此进入-本书在线PDF格式电子书下载【推荐-云解压-方便快捷】直接下载PDF格式图书。移动端-PC端通用
种子下载[BT下载速度快]温馨提示：（请使用BT下载软件FDM进行下载）软件下载地址页直链下载[便捷但速度慢] [在线试读本书] [在线获取解压码]

点击复制MD5值：045e98528ede98a6d32ece550cdc9f7b

下载说明

THE SEPRATION OF POWERS AND LEGISATIVE INTERFERENCE IN JUDICIAL PROCESSPDF格式电子书版下载

下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。

点击复制85GB完整离线版磁力链接到迅雷FDM等BT下载工具进行下载详情点击-查看共享计划

建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台）。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用！后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载！

（文件页数要大于标注页数，上中下等多册电子书除外）

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

图书目录

1 Introduction1

Ⅰ.The Relevant Scenarios3

Ⅱ.Definitional Difficulties7

Ⅲ.The Original Legal Entrenchment of the Doctrine and the Underlying Rationale10

Ⅳ. The Possibility of General Principles and Interpretational Methodology14

Ⅴ. The Purposive Nature of The Separation of Powers Doctrine29

Ⅵ.The Problem of Definition and the Formalist Approach37

Ⅶ.Core Branch Functions?40

2 Legislative Interference in the Pending Case Scenario: The Foundation of Principle and the Australian Position57

Ⅰ.Introduction57

Ⅱ.The Australian Constitutional Position and the Early Australian Constitutional Scholars57

Ⅲ.Early Development of Principle by the High Court65

Ⅳ The Foundation of a Discrete Set of Principles Governing the Pending Case Scenario: Liyanage v R67

Ⅴ. Consolidation of Principle Post-Liyanage74

Ⅵ.The Direction Rule at the Crossroads: Nicholas v The Queen90

Ⅶ.The Uncertain Status of the Direction Principle in Australia113

3 Legislative Interference with Judicial Functions: The Jurisprudence of the United States, Evaluation of Principle, and Towards Resolution117

Ⅰ.Introduction117

Ⅱ.The Emergence of the Changed Law Rule and the Direction Principle in the United States121

Ⅲ.Klein and Its Uncertain Meaning124

Ⅳ. Hart’s Thesis and the United States Foundation of the Direction Principle131

Ⅴ. The Decline of the Direction Rule: The Robertson Case135

Ⅵ.Robertson’s Uncertain Legacy: Plaut v Spendthrift Farm Inc145

Ⅶ.Klein Qualified, Overruled or Misinterpreted? Miller v French152

Ⅷ.The Schiavo Litigation162

Ⅸ.Further Confirmation of the Direction Principle168

Ⅹ.General Conclusions on the Separation of Powers and the Pending Case Scenario170

ⅩⅠ.Towards a Resolution174

ⅩⅡ.A Reformulated Direction Principle177

ⅩⅢ.Speculative Propositions180

ⅩⅣ Conclusion186

4 The Separation of Powers and Final Judgments: Defining the Principle Limiting Legislative Revision of Final Judgments191

Ⅰ.Introduction and Definition of Final Judgment191

Ⅱ.Reflections on Finality Where the Separation Doctrine is Not Entrenched195

Ⅲ.A Middle Case: India202

Ⅳ.Early Australian Commentary on the Constitutional Protection of Final Judgments206

Ⅴ. The Current Australian Position210

Ⅵ.Qualifications212

Ⅶ.A Reinforcement of Australian Jurisprudence: The Irish Position on Final Judgments215

Ⅷ.The United States Supreme Court and Final Judgments217

Ⅸ.The Wheeling Bridge Qualification222

Ⅹ.The Development and Consolidation of Principle by the United States Supreme Court224

ⅩⅠ.The Inviolability Principle Tested: Miller v French236

ⅩⅡ.Conclusion245

5 Qualifications to the Inviolability of Final Judgments and Final Summation247

Ⅰ.Introduction247

Ⅱ.The Wheeling Bridge Qualification, the Regulation of Public Rights and ‘Conditional’ Final Judgments249

Ⅲ.The Waiver Qualification251

Ⅳ.Conclusions on the Final Case Scenario267

6 Protections Afforded Decisional Independence in Jurisdictions without an Entrenched Separation of Powers271

Ⅰ.Introduction271

Ⅱ.The United Kingdom and the Separation of Powers272

Ⅲ.The European Convention on Human Rights288

Ⅳ.The United Kingdom, the ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998.302

Ⅴ. Canons of Statutory Intepretation306

7 Conclusion311

Index321